Vuln Intelligence

When everything is critical,
nothing gets fixed first

Vuln Intelligence pulls findings from every scanner into one queue, ranked by code origin: the asset each finding comes from and that asset's real risk. Then it opens the ticket, owner and deadline included, in the tool your team already uses.

See a demoExplore plans
Vuln Intelligence backlog overview in Conviso Platform, with findings by risk and source and SLAs coming due

Why your backlog grows faster than your team can fix it

Volume without context

More scanners, hundreds of findings a week, and a growing share of code written by AI agents. Without a filter for each asset's real risk, the backlog piles up faster than anyone can work through it.

Alerts developers learned to ignore

When an alert shows up with false positives, a generic severity, and no suggested fix, developers close the tab. At that point, the tool isn't doing its job.

Findings nobody owns

The scan caught it, but no ticket was opened. Or one was, with no SLA and no owner, and the vulnerability stays exploitable for who knows how long.

From finding to fixed ticket, in one flow

Vuln Intelligence runs on the findings you already have. Connect the scanners your team uses today, no rip-and-replace.

Findings from multiple sources consolidated in Conviso Platform, with duplicates grouped
Vulnerability queue ranked by risk, showing asset criticality and code origin
Conviso Platform finding status and remediation SLA next to the Jira integration, connected as the team's defect tracker

What changes for your team

Conviso Platform connects what your scanners find to what your developers need to fix.

Context instead of noise

Every finding comes with the asset's risk, its expected impact, and what to do about it, not just a CVE and a generic severity. Noise drops from the very first sprint.

Alerts developers trust again

AI sharpens the analysis and filters out false positives before a finding ever becomes a ticket. A few sprints in, developers start paying attention again, because what reaches them is real. On Advanced and Enterprise plans.

An owner and a deadline for every finding

Owners and SLAs come from your program's rules, not from whoever spotted the alert first. Nobody has to ask who's on it.

Fixes ready to merge

Autofix proposes the patch, and Reachability tells a vulnerable dependency apart from one your code actually reaches. Human sign-off before a fix merges is optional. Your call. On Advanced and Enterprise plans.

Batch triage by your own agents, with a preview first

MCP Server exposes the backlog to external agents in real time, and Conviso Skills lets them run batch operations like triage, owner assignment, and risk adjustments, with a preview step before anything changes.

Built for teams with scanners already running

No scanner running yet? Start with AI Secure Code. Its findings flow into Vuln Intelligence automatically.

For AppSec teams that want to burn down the backlog by risk

Scanners are running, but priorities are unclear and fixes aren't tracked to the finish. Now there's one risk-ranked queue, traceable from finding to closed ticket.

For companies running scanners from multiple vendors that want one workflow

SAST, DAST, or SCA from different vendors, each with its own console and severity scale. Now every finding is deduplicated and ranked by the same criteria.

For engineering leaders who want developers to trust alerts again

Developers get volume and generic severities today, and they've learned to tune them out. Now they only see what's actionable, with the context to fix it.

Plans for every stage of your program

Priced by asset volume in annual tiers. No surprise bills.

Feature
Pro
Advanced
Enterprise
Risk-based prioritization, correlation, and deduplication
✓
✓
✓
Third-party scanner findings
✓
✓
✓
Automated tickets with two-way sync
✓
✓
✓
Vulnerability templates, MCP Server, and Conviso Skills
✓
✓
✓
AI false-positive review, Autofix, and Reachability
✓
✓
Granular Security Gate and program documentation
✓
✓
Support SLA
24h
16h
8h
See all plans and pricing

Works with the tools you already use

Repositories and CI/CD

GitHubGitLabBitbucketAzure DevOpsJenkins

Ticketing and chat

JiraAzure BoardsServiceNowZendeskLinearSlackMicrosoft Teams

Third-party scanners

VeracodeCheckmarxFortifySnykSonarQube

API and automation

MCP ServerREST API
See all integrations

Frequently asked questions

We already use Jira. Why do we need this?

Jira tracks tasks; it doesn't rank security risk. Vuln Intelligence feeds Jira the risk-based priority, the SLA, and the asset context it's missing.

We run DefectDojo with open source scanners. What would change?

DefectDojo is solid software and an OWASP flagship project, and Semgrep, Trivy, and ZAP are excellent scanners. The real cost is in running it: maintaining the instance, parsers, and integrations, tuning out false positives, and relying on the one or two people who know how it all fits together. Vuln Intelligence gives you consolidation and deduplication with no infrastructure to manage, ranks findings by risk with business context, and comes with a support SLA. You can migrate gradually and keep what already works.

Do we have to replace our current scanners?

No. Vuln Intelligence takes in findings from tools like Veracode, Checkmarx, Fortify, Snyk, and SonarQube and ranks them by the same criteria.

Do we need a formal AppSec program to get started?

No. One scanner producing findings is enough. When you're ready for threat modeling and program maturity, Threat & Program Management builds on the same data, no migration needed.

Can AI push fixes without our team's sign-off?

Only if you want it to. On Advanced and Enterprise plans, AI sharpens the analysis, filters out false positives, and proposes fixes with Autofix. Whether a fix needs human approval before it merges is up to your team.

Less noise.
More fixes shipped.

Book time with an expert

30 minutes with an AppSec specialistBuilt around your organization’s contextNo canned demo