Autonomous Pentest with AI
Offensive security for Web and APIs with the speed of AI
Autonomous AI-driven pentest that performs real attack simulations, identifies vulnerabilities, and delivers a severity-prioritized list, technical evidence with proof of concept, documented attack chains, and execution history for continuous re-testing.
A dynamic attack surface requires continuous offensive validation
Modern development environments combine web applications, APIs, microservices, and external integrations. Each deployment changes the exposed surface and may introduce new attack vectors. Traditional scanners identify technical patterns. The market increasingly requires real exploitation validation and a clear demonstration of impact.
Today, companies face a common scenario:
Partial visibility into routes and endpoints that are actually exposed
Difficulty validating the exploitability of identified vulnerabilities
Lack of chaining between isolated vulnerabilities
Insufficient evidence for risk-based prioritization
Point-in-time testing that does not keep up with application evolution
A segurança que acompanha o ritmo da sua fintech
Unimos tecnologia, inteligência e consultoria Combinamos tecnologia, inteligência e consultoria para transformar vulnerabilidades em eficiência e conformidade contínua.para transformar vulnerabilidades em confiança e compliance contínuo.
Autonomous Pentesting begins by identifying the application’s effectively exposed surface. This phase consolidates accessible routes, active endpoints, communication patterns, and implemented controls. The goal is to structure a functional inventory of the application's behavior before exploring specific vulnerabilities.

How we structure this stage
Identification of valid URLs and accessible routes
Mapping of API endpoints
Discovery of available HTTP methods
Analysis of accepted parameters, headers, and payloads
Identification of exposed surfaces and accessible resources
Observation of implemented authentication patterns
Direct impact
Consolidated mapping of the attack surface
Objective direction for exploitation attempts
Identification of routes and assets outside the expected scope
Environment configuration determines how the application responds, which controls are active, and which resources remain accessible. This stage evaluates the structural layer supporting the application—server configuration, applied policies, and exposed resources—to identify deviations that increase the attack surface.

How we analyze this layer
Evaluation of web server configurations
Verification of applied security policies
Identification of missing or misconfigured security headers
Detection of sensitive file exposure
Analysis of publicly accessible directories and resources
Direct impact
Identification of structural weaknesses
Hardening-oriented remediation guidance
Reduction of unnecessary exposure
Authentication mechanisms control initial access to the application. This stage evaluates how identity is validated, how sessions are maintained, and which conditions may allow unauthorized access. The objective is to identify deviations that enable the use of invalid credentials, session reuse, or token manipulation.

How tests are conducted
Evaluation of login mechanism robustness
Credential validation tests
Session management analysis
Evaluation of authentication tokens, such as JWT
Verification of session expiration and renewal
Direct impact
Identification of vulnerabilities allowing unauthorized access
Exposure of weaknesses in session management
Foundation for improving authentication and identity control policies
After authentication, authorization determines which actions each user can perform and which resources remain restricted. This stage evaluates the consistency of access control rules implemented in the application and verifies whether discrepancies exist between assigned roles and effectively enforced permissions.

How this validation is structured
Evaluation of role-based access control
Identification of unauthorized access to restricted resources
User segregation testing
Parameter manipulation to verify privilege escalation
Analysis of data exposure between accounts
Direct impact
Identification of segregation failures between user roles
Exposure of unauthorized access to data and features
Foundation for reviewing authorization rules and access policies
After mapping the surface and analyzing controls, Autonomous Pentesting attempts exploitation based on identified vectors. The objective is to verify whether vulnerabilities can be used to alter application behavior, access data, or perform actions outside the intended workflow.

We execute and validate vulnerabilities such as
Injections, including SQL Injection
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
Path Traversal
Parameter manipulation
Input validation failures
Unauthorized data exposure
Configuration weaknesses
Vulnerabilities associated with the OWASP Top 10
Direct impact
Practical confirmation of exploitability
Reproducible evidence
Risk-based prioritization
Isolated exploitation rarely represents the full scenario.

How chaining is structured
Connection between multiple vulnerabilities
Using one vulnerability as a starting point for another
Demonstration of real attack paths
Logical structuring of the exploitation flow
Direct impact
Confirmation of effective vulnerability exploitation
Structured record of the exploitation sequence
Prioritization based on observed impact during testing
Test execution considers the responses returned by the application at each interaction attempt. Blocks, status codes, error messages, and behavior variations influence the sequence of subsequent actions.

During execution
Continuous analysis of application responses
Dynamic adjustment of payloads
Modification of exploitation strategy
Prioritization of surfaces with greater impact potential
Direct impact
Behavior-driven coverage of the application
Identification of vectors that emerge from observed responses
Exploitation sequence adapted to the application context
Each Autonomous Pentest execution is structured within the Conviso Platform, with a complete record of the evaluated scope, performed interactions, and confirmed vulnerabilities. The objective is to consolidate evidence, context, and traceability in a single workflow, enabling later analysis, remediation validation, and comparison between testing cycles.
Execution includes:
Platform-structured project with full description of the execution and scope context
List of identified vulnerabilities with severity classification and affected application or asset
Complete evidence including detailed requests and responses, payloads used, reproducible proof of concept, and executed exploitation sequence
Documented attack chain showing vulnerability chaining, structured exploitation flow, and amplified impact demonstration
Historical traceability with records of previous executions, comparison between cycles, and baseline for re-testing and remediation validation
Autonomous Pentest within the AI Autonomous AppSec Operation
The Autonomous Pentest integrates into your AppSec program and follows the evolution of your application. It performs exposed surface discovery, validates vulnerability exploitation, records complete evidence, and maintains cross-cycle history connected to the remediation workflow.
Conviso Platform for offensive security with AI and simulated attacks
The Conviso Platform centralizes pentest execution and result management. Exploited vulnerabilities, evidence, attack chains, and execution history are organized by application and connected to remediation workflows and risk evolution.

Talk to our specialists and see how to apply Autonomous Pentesting to your development lifecycle.