Jira runs your team's work.
Conviso runs your AppSec program.
Plenty of teams track findings and pentests in Jira. It's great at moving work, but it wasn't built to dedupe, rank by risk, or follow a fix all the way through. Conviso Platform handles that part and sends Jira only what your team needs to fix.
The 30-second version
Each tool does the job it was built for
What Jira does well
Your developers' workflow
- Assigning tasks and running sprints
- Showing the team what's shipping
- Being where the fix actually happens
What Conviso Platform handles
What goes into Jira, and what happens next
- Findings deduped and risk-ranked before they become tickets
- Pentests tracked from scope to fix
- Posture and evidence ready for the board and auditors
Jira stays your developers' workflow.Conviso Platform becomes your source of truth for risk and feeds Jira what matters.
Side by side
Capability by capability
We compared Jira with the most popular security plugins on the Atlassian Marketplace. The row where Jira is the better choice stays in the table.
Source: public Jira Software Cloud and Atlassian Marketplace documentation, reviewed October 2026. Jira is a trademark of Atlassian.
Where it breaks down
A ticket doesn't know what a vulnerability is
Managing AppSec means correlating risk, adding technical context, and tracing every fix. An issue tracker stores tasks, so each of those layers turns into somebody's manual work.
One issue, five tickets
SAST, DAST, SCA, and pentests describe the same flaw in different ways, and nobody knows how many real vulnerabilities you have.
One finding, one ticket
The platform correlates results before it opens a ticket, so your backlog counts vulnerabilities, not alerts.
Priority by gut feel
High, medium, and low with no CVSS, exposure, or business context. Everything ends up critical, or nothing does.
Priorities nobody has to defend
Risk is scored on asset criticality, exposure, and application context, and the SLA comes from your program's rules.
Status drifts away from the scanner
Exporting findings is easy. Keeping reopens, evidence, and status in sync with your scanners is constant manual work.
Same status on both sides
Two-way sync: what changes in Conviso Platform changes in Jira, and what your team updates in Jira flows back to the platform.
Pentests end up as PDFs
The report sits on a ticket, cut off from the fix and from the app's risk history.
Every pentest finding becomes an owned ticket
The campaign lives in the platform, from scope to evidence per asset, and each finding reaches Jira with priority and context like any other.
How they work together
Developers stay in Jira.
Risk gets a source of truth.
Conviso Platform decides what becomes a ticket, at what priority, and with what SLA. From there, sync runs both ways: a change on one side shows up on the other, with no manual updates.
Also works with Azure Boards, Linear, ServiceNow, and Zendesk.
Scanners and pentests
SAST, DAST, SCA, and pentests surface findings
Conviso Platform
Dedupes, ranks by risk, and sets the SLA
Jira
The ticket reaches developers with fix context
Development team
Fixes it in their usual flow and updates the ticket
Conviso Platform
Syncs the status and logs the finding's history
The cost that never shows up on an invoice
It looks free.
Someone's paying for it.
“We already have Jira” sounds like savings. In practice, the cost moves to your team's time and to risk nobody can measure.
Developers and tech leads
Noise without context
Tickets show up duplicated, without fix guidance, and sometimes as false positives. Developers burn time triaging and start tuning out the next alert.
AppSec team
The team becomes the bottleneck
Merging spreadsheets, copying findings between tools, and justifying priorities one by one eats the week. Program work keeps slipping.
CISOs and security leaders
Posture becomes a guess
Without reliable data for the board or a PCI DSS audit, every answer about real risk is an estimate.
Frequently asked questions
What teams ask before they switch
Do we have to give up Jira?
No. Conviso Platform integrates with Jira and keeps developers in the workflow they already use. What changes is what lands in the ticket: real findings, ranked by risk, with fix context.
We already use security plugins in Jira. Isn't that enough?
Plugins move data into Jira. Cross-tool deduplication, risk-based prioritization, SBOM, and program management need a security data model that an issue tracker doesn't have.
Isn't this one more tool to maintain?
In practice, it replaces spreadsheets, homegrown integrations, and manual consolidation. Your AppSec team ends up running fewer tools, not more.
Does it work with tools other than Jira?
Yes. It also integrates with Azure Boards, Linear, ServiceNow, and Zendesk, with the same automatic ticket creation and two-way status sync.
How does this help with audits?
Every finding is tracked from discovery to fix, and your PCI DSS program runs on the same trail, with gap assessment, evidence, and audit records. For the board, maturity is measured with OWASP SAMM and compared cycle over cycle.
See what's missing between your Jira and an AppSec program
30 minutes with an AppSec specialistBuilt around your Jira setupNo canned demo