Jira runs your team's work.
Conviso runs your AppSec program.

Plenty of teams track findings and pentests in Jira. It's great at moving work, but it wasn't built to dedupe, rank by risk, or follow a fix all the way through. Conviso Platform handles that part and sends Jira only what your team needs to fix.

Keep Jira. Conviso plugs into the workflow your team already uses.

Updated October 2026

The 30-second version

Each tool does the job it was built for

What Jira does well

Your developers' workflow

  • Assigning tasks and running sprints
  • Showing the team what's shipping
  • Being where the fix actually happens

What Conviso Platform handles

What goes into Jira, and what happens next

  • Findings deduped and risk-ranked before they become tickets
  • Pentests tracked from scope to fix
  • Posture and evidence ready for the board and auditors

Jira stays your developers' workflow.Conviso Platform becomes your source of truth for risk and feeds Jira what matters.

Side by side

Capability by capability

We compared Jira with the most popular security plugins on the Atlassian Marketplace. The row where Jira is the better choice stays in the table.

Capability
Jira, with or without plugins
Conviso Platform
Developer task workflow
Jira, with or without plugins
Covered:Best in class: sprints, boards, and assignments
Conviso Platform
Covered:Creates tickets and keeps status in sync both waysVuln Intelligence
Deduplication across SAST, DAST, SCA, and pentest
Jira, with or without plugins
Partly covered:Manual, or plugin rules
Conviso Platform
Covered:Automatic, before a ticket existsVuln Intelligence
Risk-based prioritization
Jira, with or without plugins
Partly covered:Priority set by hand
Conviso Platform
Covered:Asset criticality, exposure, and application contextVuln Intelligence
Dependency inventory (SBOM)
Jira, with or without plugins
Not covered:Not built in
Conviso Platform
Covered:Generated and maintained from your repositoriesThreat & Program Management
Threat modeling
Jira, with or without plugins
Not covered:Not built in
Conviso Platform
Covered:Manual or AI-generated from your architectureThreat & Program Management
Pentest management
Jira, with or without plugins
Not covered:Report attached to a ticket
Conviso Platform
Covered:From scope to fix, with evidence per assetOffensive & Audit Manager
Program maturity and posture
Jira, with or without plugins
Partly covered:Possible, with a BI project
Conviso Platform
Covered:OWASP SAMM plus posture and coverage dashboardsThreat & Program Management
PCI DSS program and audit evidence
Jira, with or without plugins
Not covered:Rebuilt by hand every cycle
Conviso Platform
Covered:Gap assessment, evidence, and audit trailOffensive & Audit Manager

Source: public Jira Software Cloud and Atlassian Marketplace documentation, reviewed October 2026. Jira is a trademark of Atlassian.

Where it breaks down

A ticket doesn't know what a vulnerability is

Managing AppSec means correlating risk, adding technical context, and tracing every fix. An issue tracker stores tasks, so each of those layers turns into somebody's manual work.

One issue, five tickets

SAST, DAST, SCA, and pentests describe the same flaw in different ways, and nobody knows how many real vulnerabilities you have.

One finding, one ticket

The platform correlates results before it opens a ticket, so your backlog counts vulnerabilities, not alerts.

Priority by gut feel

High, medium, and low with no CVSS, exposure, or business context. Everything ends up critical, or nothing does.

Priorities nobody has to defend

Risk is scored on asset criticality, exposure, and application context, and the SLA comes from your program's rules.

Status drifts away from the scanner

Exporting findings is easy. Keeping reopens, evidence, and status in sync with your scanners is constant manual work.

Same status on both sides

Two-way sync: what changes in Conviso Platform changes in Jira, and what your team updates in Jira flows back to the platform.

Pentests end up as PDFs

The report sits on a ticket, cut off from the fix and from the app's risk history.

Every pentest finding becomes an owned ticket

The campaign lives in the platform, from scope to evidence per asset, and each finding reaches Jira with priority and context like any other.

How they work together

Developers stay in Jira.
Risk gets a source of truth.

Conviso Platform decides what becomes a ticket, at what priority, and with what SLA. From there, sync runs both ways: a change on one side shows up on the other, with no manual updates.

Also works with Azure Boards, Linear, ServiceNow, and Zendesk.

  1. Scanners and pentests

    SAST, DAST, SCA, and pentests surface findings

  2. Conviso Platform

    Dedupes, ranks by risk, and sets the SLA

  3. Jira

    The ticket reaches developers with fix context

  4. Development team

    Fixes it in their usual flow and updates the ticket

  5. Conviso Platform

    Syncs the status and logs the finding's history

The cost that never shows up on an invoice

It looks free.
Someone's paying for it.

“We already have Jira” sounds like savings. In practice, the cost moves to your team's time and to risk nobody can measure.

Developers and tech leads

Noise without context

Tickets show up duplicated, without fix guidance, and sometimes as false positives. Developers burn time triaging and start tuning out the next alert.

AppSec team

The team becomes the bottleneck

Merging spreadsheets, copying findings between tools, and justifying priorities one by one eats the week. Program work keeps slipping.

CISOs and security leaders

Posture becomes a guess

Without reliable data for the board or a PCI DSS audit, every answer about real risk is an estimate.

Frequently asked questions

What teams ask before they switch

Do we have to give up Jira?

No. Conviso Platform integrates with Jira and keeps developers in the workflow they already use. What changes is what lands in the ticket: real findings, ranked by risk, with fix context.

We already use security plugins in Jira. Isn't that enough?

Plugins move data into Jira. Cross-tool deduplication, risk-based prioritization, SBOM, and program management need a security data model that an issue tracker doesn't have.

Isn't this one more tool to maintain?

In practice, it replaces spreadsheets, homegrown integrations, and manual consolidation. Your AppSec team ends up running fewer tools, not more.

Does it work with tools other than Jira?

Yes. It also integrates with Azure Boards, Linear, ServiceNow, and Zendesk, with the same automatic ticket creation and two-way status sync.

How does this help with audits?

Every finding is tracked from discovery to fix, and your PCI DSS program runs on the same trail, with gap assessment, evidence, and audit records. For the board, maturity is measured with OWASP SAMM and compared cycle over cycle.

See what's missing between your Jira and an AppSec program

30 minutes with an AppSec specialistBuilt around your Jira setupNo canned demo